Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 11:48:49 03/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 1999 at 01:22:27, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 08, 1999 at 01:18:59, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>This is as close as I can come. It is the same position with two variations. >>For both, one move is not a capture: >>5rk1/2pp2p1/1p4Pp/5r2/P3B3/2B1P3/q1n2nRP/4KR2 w - - id "C.A.P.85885"; ce -32759; >>pv Bxc2 Qxc2 Rfxf2 Rxf2 Rxf2 Rxf2 e4 Qe2# >>5rk1/2pp2p1/1p4Pp/5r2/P3B3/2B1P3/q1n2nRP/4KR2 w - - id "C.A.P.85885"; ce -32759; >>pv Bxc2 Qxc2 Rfxf2 Rxf2 Rxf2 Rxf2 h4 Qe2# >> >>Of course you could tweak the position to something like this: >>5rk1/2pp2p1/1p4Pp/P4r2/4B3/2B1P3/q1n2nRP/4KR2 w - - >>and change the e4 or h4 into a pawn capture instead. The problem with this >>position is that after two plies [strikes? ;-)] the outcome is obvious. >> >>I suspect that some of the regulars here can whip up something a lot more >>dramatic. >After the tweak, it goes like this: >5rk1/2pp2p1/1p4Pp/P4r2/4B3/2B1P3/q1n2nRP/4KR2 w - - >Move sequence: Bxc2 Qxc2 Rfxf2 Rxf2 Rxf2 Rxf2 axb6 Qe2#; Oops, the last move is not a "strike". It needs a little more tweaking.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.