Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 05:07:09 10/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2005 at 06:32:48, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>Which of these two ways to organise a chess GUI do you prefer, >>and why? > >Personally i prefer the way Chessbase have done it, where you get it all in one >window, but still you can arrange the windows however you like (or almost >atleast). I am not sure I understand this. What does it mean that you can "arrange the windows however you like" when there is only one window? Is it some kind of "windows inside a window" GUI? I have only worked with such a GUI once (the Linux version of the computer algebra system Maple), and I abolutely hated it. >Second choice would be multible windows, I think this will be my choice. I just have to find a good solution to the problem of several running games. >everything in a single window (static) is just plain annoying if you as me. I agree, especially when it is not even possible to resize the components of the window. Sigma Chess is awful in this respect. The window size and the size and layout of the components are completly fixed. You can choose between three different board sizes, that's all. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.