Author: Kai Skibbe
Date: 13:33:42 10/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2005 at 12:41:57, Albert Silver wrote: >As I've been testing the various engines on the PDA, and I just acquired Pocket >Grandmaster that has further engines available, I decided to do a quick >comparison on Fruit 2.1 running on PGM as opposed to CEBoard. > >I admit I only did this testing expecting a maximum difference of a couple of >percent, since they were both running identically, with 8MB hash. However the >results were quite different. Fruit 2.1 running on CEBoard was consistently >about 40% faster in a half dozen test positions. I can test more, but I don't >expect any change in results. When Fruit achieved 45kns in CEBoard, it would >achieve 32 in PGM, and this was apparent at all times. > >I found this quite surprising and wonder the reason. > > Albert Hi Albert, I don´t know why Fruit-CEBoard is faster. Maybe it´s compiled with different and better compiler optimizations. Kai
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.