Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:12:23 10/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2005 at 04:03:26, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >On October 09, 2005 at 12:41:57, Albert Silver wrote: > >>As I've been testing the various engines on the PDA, and I just acquired Pocket >>Grandmaster that has further engines available, I decided to do a quick >>comparison on Fruit 2.1 running on PGM as opposed to CEBoard. > >>I admit I only did this testing expecting a maximum difference of a couple of >>percent, since they were both running identically, with 8MB hash. However the >>results were quite different. Fruit 2.1 running on CEBoard was consistently >>about 40% faster in a half dozen test positions. I can test more, but I don't >>expect any change in results. When Fruit achieved 45kns in CEBoard, it would >>achieve 32 in PGM, and this was apparent at all times. > >>I found this quite surprising and wonder the reason. > >Hi Albert, > >Indeed! >Did you check node count? > >Fabien. from the original post that you quote: "When Fruit achieved 45kns in CEBoard, it would achieve 32 in PGM, and this was apparent at all times." Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.