Author: Albert Silver
Date: 12:37:54 10/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2005 at 15:10:59, A. Zanchetta wrote:
>>
>>Do you get similar results compared to PGM on your PPC?
>>
>
>I haven't made careful comparisons but a few games between Fruit/CEBoard and
>Fruit/PGM running on two low end Pocket PCs : Acer N30 and Dell X5.
>
>The result (+2=2-1 for CEBoard) was not significant due to the very few games
>played (5) and the opening played a very important role in the decisive games.
>The NPS reported by both programs were very close.
>
>I did not test Fruit/PGM on my Qtek 9090.
Try FruitPGM on it and compare it with Fruit running on CEBoard. Test a few
positions. Here are 2-3 that you can try:
[D]8/2p5/7p/pP2k1pP/5pP1/8/1P2PPK1/8 w - - 0 1
Fruit on CEBoard with 8 MB hash takes 55s (on my Dell) to find 1.f3!
[D]r4kr1/5p1p/p3q1p1/1p1pP3/2pP4/2P2Q2/5PPP/RR4K1 w - - 0 1
Fruit on CEBoard with 8 MB hash takes 62s (on my Dell) to find 1.Qf6!
[D]4rrk1/1bpR1p2/1pq1pQp1/p3P2p/P1PR3P/5NK1/2P2PP1/8 w - - 0 2
Fruit on CEBoard with 8 MB hash takes 62s (on my Dell) to find 1.Kf4!
See what you get on CEboard on your PPC and then compare with PGM.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.