Author: Günther Simon
Date: 12:43:01 10/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2005 at 14:14:28, James Swafford wrote: >On October 26, 2005 at 13:42:54, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On October 26, 2005 at 13:16:36, James Swafford wrote: >> >>>On October 26, 2005 at 09:32:23, Günther Simon wrote: >>> >>>>On October 26, 2005 at 09:08:09, Swaminathan wrote: >>>> >>>>...snip... >>>> >>>>>You are not going to flame the work of Dan Brown when he brings >>>>>criticsm against christianity. >>>> >>>>I have never seen a post about christianity in CCC and neither do I know >>>>a poster named 'Dan Brown' here? >>>>May be you mix CCC with CTF? Those posts would be more than OT here. >>> >>>http://www.danbrown.com/novels/davinci_code/faqs.html >> >>Fine Bruce, but what has trivial literature to do with CCC? > >Bruce? > >Anyway, I don't claim it has anything to do with CCC. However, >I think you misunderstood. Rephrased, Swami was saying "just as >you wouldn't flame Dan Brown for criticizing Christianity, don't >flame me for criticizing computer chess." Not that I think that's >a particularly good analogy, but I believe that's what he meant. > >-- >James > > >> >>Guenther Sorry James, no idea why I had Bruce Moreland in mind, when answering:) I really understand his anology. Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.