Author: Roger Brown
Date: 16:27:47 11/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
> >When a program surpasses the best commercial programs the matter >becomes more debatable, and I have no difficulties accepting that >Fabien felt forced to hide his source with Fruit 2.2. A program on >the level of Glaurung, however, is utterly harmless. Hiding the source >wouldn't make any sense at all. Hello Tord, I really "hate" these posts. I mean, what is the meaning of weak? Glaurung is going to kick my nether regions for years to come. I am so happy that you have written a weak program....for a strong player to beat. Any possibility of including a strength weakening feature in the UCI 2 code? Your modesty is wonderful....if somewhat misleading. Glaurung is no patzer. Later.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.