Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Grand Master Yermolinsky vs. Hiarcs 7

Author: Matt Frank

Date: 05:42:00 03/18/99

Go up one level in this thread


On March 18, 1999 at 02:59:47, blass uri wrote:

>
>On March 17, 1999 at 21:09:12, Will Singleton wrote:
>
>>On March 17, 1999 at 16:12:50, KarinsDad wrote:
>>
>>>On March 17, 1999 at 15:54:10, Matt Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>>Well I have been given permission to announce that Grand Master Alex Yermolinsky
>>>>will play a match of six games in early June against Hiarcs 7 running on my PPC
>>>>G3 233 MHZ computer. The match will be 6 games played at tournament/match level
>>>>conditions (i.e., 40/2 60/game) and will played sometime between June 2-10 of
>>>>this year. Sorry about the delay in announcing this match. Final details have
>>>>not been formalized, yet Mr. Yermolinsky and I have shown an eagerness to
>>>>conduct the match pending final logistical arrangements. Financial details will
>>>>not be revealed unless Mr. Yermolinsky agrees to that information being
>>>>provided.
>>>>
>>>>I am excited about this opportunity to gather data on the level of chess playing
>>>>computers vs. strong GMs.
>>>>
>>>>Sincerely,
>>>>Matt Frank
>>>
>>>The Yerminator!!! Excellent!!
>>>
>>>I fear Hiarcs7 is in for a fall but only the games will tell.
>>>
>>>I really look forward to this. Great work Matt!!
>>>
>>>KarinsDad :) :)
>>
>>
>>I feel a poll question coming up.  Personally, I think H7 will score at least 3
>>points.
>
>personally I think that hiarcs7 will score less than 2 points
>I looked at the games of Hiarcs7 and I am not impressed by the positional
>unserstanding of it.
>
>I know that Junior5 lost against Yodusin 1.5:0.5 in tournament time control.
>Yodusin could not prepare against Junior5 when Mr. Yermolinsky can prepare
>against Hiarcs7 so it will be a big surprise if a 2630 GM with preparaion will
>not win the match convincingly.
>
>Uri

Blass I respect your opinion. We will have wait and see what the outcome is in
June. I think that a mistake that humans make is to assume that a position that
we have come to know as "won" may in fact not be a "win", and vice-versa. I
don't want to overstate the case, but Hiarcs 7 has strengths that will hold it
in good stead for this match, notwitstanding your concerns. Primarily, Hiarcs 7
knows a lot more about opening positions than it did before.

Regards,
Matt Frank



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.