Author: Steffen Jakob
Date: 22:14:35 03/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 1999 at 11:41:11, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On March 17, 1999 at 06:55:58, Steffen Jakob wrote: > >>I also dont understand ECE #9. It doesn't matter what black plays. He is lost... >>ECE doesn't seem to be very usefull for automatic endgame testing. Any comments? >> >>Greetings, >>Steffen. > >Could you please post the EPD string for ECE #9? 8/2P5/1K6/3r4/8/8/8/k7 b - - bm Rd6+; id "ECE3.0009"; > I do not know how good is ECE to test the engines's endgame. I would suggest It's not very good. The positions are interesting for humans but not for automatic testing. >playing from interesting endgame position arisen in grandmaster games, both >sides, against other engines or strong humans. I think that is more revealing >about the engines strengths and weaknesses in the endgame than any testsuite. Yes, but it takes a lot of time to collect those positions :-) Greetings, Steffen.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.