Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hard pawn endgame?

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 12:07:07 11/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 17, 2005 at 14:27:48, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

>On November 17, 2005 at 10:13:27, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>The original position is mate in 36 based on backward analysis by yace
>
>You might be interested to know how to find the mate score in such a position
>with Yace even without TBs.
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I meant to say, "even without backwards analysis".

I agree with your followup. I don't agree really with what you said earlier in
this thread: "Maybe yace is lucky [in this position]".

Regards,
Dieter




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.