Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:15:51 11/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2005 at 16:19:19, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On November 19, 2005 at 15:39:50, JNoomen wrote: > >>On November 19, 2005 at 15:02:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>Hi Vincent, >> >>As I proposed to you: I would like to play a rematch Fruit - Diep with the move >>19.Kb1 being played. As I now have a 3-0 with Fruit against Fritz 9 with 19.Kb1, >>I am confident that Fruit will beat Diep as well. >> >>So name a time, a place and a date, I am ready for it! >> >>Jeroen >> >> >>PS For the readers here at CCC: I proposed to play a game with 19.Kb1 after the >>match ended, which was refused by Vincent >> >> >> > > >I had decided not to reply all the garbage written here. However, my patience >with the baby crying is over. Since you don't stop to cry again and again, I am >very confident that Diep would beat you again. I do not think that it is correct to describe JNoomen behaviour as crying. Playing against Fritz at least show evidence that fruit may beat some opponents with Kb1. I think that it is clear that it is not a proof that it could beat diep with Kb1. Diep already did it with the >Erdogan Book as well as with my lines that you use to call "craps" in every >Tournaments. I do not remember JNoomen using the word "craps" about your lines. In this specific Tournament, every Jeroen's line was not able to >beat my "crappy lines", eventhough you had the advantages to be in 3 engines: >Fruit, ProDeo and Sjeng (all version of your book). Diep was white in the case of Prodeo and Sjeng and only drew the game. I guess that Prodeo one processor is weaker than Diep with many processors so draw with black against Diep is a success for the book author. > >Diep doesn't have to play a specific line or game against you, because we won >the battle on that game. It is not a problem for Diep or me, if you failed in >that game. Diep does not have to play a game but if Vincent does not want to play a game it is better if he says nothing about it. If the reason for not telling information is that you want to hide your book preperation then I see no reason to tell part of the information. If that claim is misinformation(I do not claim that it is the case and I do not know) then there may be a reason to do it but I think that it is immoral to do it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.