Author: JNoomen
Date: 01:50:52 11/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2005 at 04:44:35, Ryan B. wrote: Hi Ryan, Vincent claims that Diep would win every game from Fruit in that position. So I merely take up the challenge :-). Jeroen >What you are doing now is what I think people would call beating a dead horse. >There is no need for this. It is easier to get over the fact that Arturo and >Vincent won this time and better prepare for the next time you meet. No matter >the outcome of the next match I hope there is much less bitterness after the >next game. > >Ryan Benitez > >On November 20, 2005 at 03:28:47, JNoomen wrote: > >>On November 19, 2005 at 16:19:19, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>Hi Arturo, >> >>There is no need to reveil any of your preparation, as you were out of book >>earlier than Fruit. Diep calculated the move ... Qc7 by itself. As I stated in >>my posting the position after 19.Kb1! is better for white. Not only I did this >>by giving a very thorough explanation why this is the case, I also provided >>games as a proof. Computers misplay this position as they overrate their attack. >> >>I proposed Vincent to play a rematch to find out whether his claim 'we all >>prepared this and Fruit will always lose against Diep from this position' is >>true. He declined. So here I am doing it again: we play a game Fruit - Diep from >>the position after 19.Kb1. >> >>Jeroen >> >> >> >>>On November 19, 2005 at 15:39:50, JNoomen wrote: >>> >>>>On November 19, 2005 at 15:02:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>> >>>>Hi Vincent, >>>> >>>>As I proposed to you: I would like to play a rematch Fruit - Diep with the move >>>>19.Kb1 being played. As I now have a 3-0 with Fruit against Fritz 9 with 19.Kb1, >>>>I am confident that Fruit will beat Diep as well. >>>> >>>>So name a time, a place and a date, I am ready for it! >>>> >>>>Jeroen >>>> >>>> >>>>PS For the readers here at CCC: I proposed to play a game with 19.Kb1 after the >>>>match ended, which was refused by Vincent >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>I had decided not to reply all the garbage written here. However, my patience >>>with the baby crying is over. Since you don't stop to cry again and again, I am >>>very confident that Diep would beat you again. Diep already did it with the >>>Erdogan Book as well as with my lines that you use to call "craps" in every >>>Tournaments. In this specific Tournament, every Jeroen's line was not able to >>>beat my "crappy lines", eventhough you had the advantages to be in 3 engines: >>>Fruit, ProDeo and Sjeng (all version of your book). >>> >>>Diep doesn't have to play a specific line or game against you, because we won >>>the battle on that game. It is not a problem for Diep or me, if you failed in >>>that game. >>> >>>I won't discuss my prepration here because I won't reveal what I prepared >>>against your "great openings". Second, it would be very silly to play after a >>>certain line that you have "prepared" very well. >>> >>>Well, as far as I know, Fritz 9 is a chessbase engine or you are accussing us ob >>>being clones of Fritz 9? I know, Diep and Fritz 9 are different engines, and >>>they play differently. If you want to know what we prepared there, wait until >>>the next Official Tournament. >>> >>>Arturo Ochoa M. >>> >>>PD: Your analysis is lack of concrete variations by the way.......
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.