Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dutch Open: the story of the game Fruit - Diep

Author: Arturo Ochoa

Date: 04:22:32 11/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 20, 2005 at 03:28:47, JNoomen wrote:

>On November 19, 2005 at 16:19:19, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
>
>Hi Arturo,
>
>There is no need to reveil any of your preparation, as you were out of book
>earlier than Fruit. Diep calculated the move ... Qc7 by itself.

1) Of course, because your "excellent" move would win every game. Of course, I
will discuss that on the board during the next Official Tournament.


As I stated in
>my posting the position after 19.Kb1! is better for white. Not only I did this
>by giving a very thorough explanation why this is the case, I also provided
>games as a proof. Computers misplay this position as they overrate their attack.
>

2) You comments often use not to be totally correct such as in certain New In
Chess Yearbook. However, I won't discuss your doubts about Kb1. If you say, it
is has a ! or !! or ?? or ?, that is the work for you.


3) "Computers misplay this position as they overrate their attack." General
declaration that may not true at all.

>I proposed Vincent to play a rematch to find out whether his claim 'we all
>prepared this and Fruit will always lose against Diep from this position' is
>true. He declined. So here I am doing it again: we play a game Fruit - Diep from
>the position after 19.Kb1.

4) As you claim that your prepration is perfect and superior, Vincent is free to
declare anything. I am doing it again, wait for the next Official Tournament.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.