Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:00:29 11/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2005 at 02:42:11, enrico carrisco wrote: >On November 21, 2005 at 02:38:15, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 20, 2005 at 22:42:02, enrico carrisco wrote: >> >>>Let's take a simple KRK ending... >>> >>>[D]8/2k5/8/3R4/8/8/5K2/8 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Now let's run it through some of our favorite new and old engines without using >>>any egtb's... (i.e. engine's knowledge of the ending only.) >>> >>>8/2k5/8/3R4/8/8/5K2/8 w - - 0 1 >> >><snipped> >>>Now let's use Fruit 2.2.1 in the same conditions (no egtb): >>> >>>8/2k5/8/3R4/8/8/5K2/8 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Fruit 2.2.1: >>> >>>1.Ke3 >>> +- (5.45) Depth: 1/1 00:00:00 >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 >>> +- (5.57) Depth: 2/2 00:00:00 >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Ke4 >>> +- (5.45) Depth: 3/4 00:00:00 >>>1.Kg3 Kb7 2.Kf4 >>> +- (5.55) Depth: 3/6 00:00:00 >>>1.Kg3 Kb7 2.Kf4 Kc6 >>> +- (5.58) Depth: 4/6 00:00:00 >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Ke4 Kc7 >>> +- (5.76) Depth: 4/6 00:00:00 >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Ke4 Kc7 3.Rc5+ Kd6 >>> +- (5.57) Depth: 5/8 00:00:00 >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Kd4 Kb6 3.Rc5 Kb7 >>> +- (5.85) Depth: 6/10 00:00:00 13kN >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Kd4 Kb6 3.Rd6+ Kb5 4.Rg6 Kb4 5.Rb6+ Ka4 >>> +- (5.89) Depth: 7/11 00:00:00 58kN >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Kd4 Kb6 3.Rd6+ Kb5 4.Rg6 Kb4 5.Rb6+ Ka5 >>> +- (5.89) Depth: 8/13 00:00:01 238kN >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Kd4 Kb6 3.Rd7 Kb5 4.Rd6 Kb4 5.Rb6+ Ka5 >>> +- (5.89) Depth: 9/14 00:00:01 972kN >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Kd4 Kb6 3.Ke5 Kc7 4.Rc5+ Kd7 5.Rc1 Ke7 6.Rc7+ Kd8 >>> +- (6.25) Depth: 10/18 00:00:01 3671kN >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Kd4 Kb6 3.Ke5 Kc7 4.Rb5 Kd7 5.Rc5 Ke7 6.Rc7+ Kd8 >>> +- (6.25) Depth: 11/19 00:00:05 13571kN >>>1.Rh5 Kd6 2.Ke3 Ke6 3.Kd4 Kd6 4.Rh6+ Ke7 5.Rc6 Ke8 6.Rc7 Kd8 >>> +- (6.26) Depth: 11/20 00:00:18 48869kN >>>1.Rh5 Kd6 2.Ke2 Kd7 3.Kd3 Kc6 4.Rh6+ Kc7 5.Rg6 Kb8 6.Rg7 Kc8 7.Kd4 >>> +- (6.14) Depth: 12/20 00:00:28 77398kN >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Ke4 Kc7 3.Ke5 Kc6 4.Ke6 Kc7 5.Rd6 Kc8 6.Rd7 Kb8 >>> +- (6.33) Depth: 12/20 00:00:30 83851kN >>>1.Ke3 Kc6 2.Kd4 Kb6 3.Rc5 Kb7 4.Ke5 Ka7 5.Rc6 Kb8 6.Rc4 Ka8 7.Rc7 >>> +- (6.45) Depth: 13/22 00:01:43 279150kN >> >>Something is wrong in your analysis >> > >This is interesting. What size hash did you use? I assume your settings are >default. > >I just re-checked it and I am getting the same analysis. > >-elc. I use 512 mbytes hash Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.