Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 01:43:06 11/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2005 at 04:24:21, A. Steen wrote: >On November 21, 2005 at 04:15:01, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>If you were born that way, I truely am sorry. > > >That is "truly", by the way. :) Thanks. >--------------- >On November 21, 2005 at 03:28:11, Aaron Gordon wrote: >>On November 21, 2005 at 03:07:08, A. Steen wrote: > >>>Cacheing > >>That is "caching", by the way. >--------------- > > >Additionally, your rejoinder bears no connection to what it rejoinds. :) It >fails at the pre-parser stage. Your accusation that I smoke, even Clintonlianly >non-inhalingly, some weed is not associated with your suggestion that I am in >some way handicapped from birth. > >Perhaps you are right. Does this make you feel superior? Why assume this? I feel sorry for you, actually, and don't bother asking my why. You already know. >>I tried Kxb3 and it is a sure loss, EGTBs showing instant mate in 73. Without >>EGTBs Fruit plays this move, with EGTBs it avoids it. > > >Ah, well, there you have Uri. :) I am still waiting for you to show me a position where EGTBs are detrimental to performance, for curiousities sake of course. Any difficulty in doing so would mean there are more positions where EGTBs help more than they hurt, so we're back to guess what? :) This looping back around to EGTBs being of benefit is getting old, so I'm leaving it at that. There you have it. >Best, > >A.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.