Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To NON-believers in EGTB benefits... (a better example)

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 07:39:47 11/21/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 21, 2005 at 10:14:48, James T. Walker wrote:

>Hello Tord,
>It seems to me that the opposite of what Uri is trying to prove is true here.
>Any program with 6 man tablebases will play Kxb3 instantly with no real search
>needed.

For a program with 6 man tablebases, yes.  But how many users do you think have
the complete 6 man tablebases installed?  Hardly anyone, I would wager.  And
even with the complete 6 man tablebases installed, the problem remains:  There
will be endgames with 7 pieces where the program refuses to make some obvious
capture because there is a very deep tablebase mate in the resulting 6 man
endgame.

I am actually fairly sure this program gets much *more* serious when going from
the complete N man EGTBs to the complete (N+1) man EGTBs (assuming that N
is far below 32, of course).  The frequency of very long and difficult wins
increase
with the number of pieces.

Tord



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.