Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A. STEEN vs. FRUIT 2.2.1 {Posted at request of Graham Banks & M. Mon

Author: Günther Simon

Date: 06:58:37 11/24/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 24, 2005 at 09:54:44, A. Steen wrote:

>On November 24, 2005 at 09:31:55, Günther Simon wrote:
>
>>On November 24, 2005 at 08:54:54, A. Steen wrote:
>
>>Nc6 is really a sensible move for a chess programs book ;)
>
>In Fruit_ASv3.ctg (in the original version as downloaded by me at the same time
>I downloaded Fruit v2.1, nothing added or taken away) it appears as-
>
> 1...Nc6!!
>
>(i.e., a preferred move, so considered better than, say, .. d5 or .. e6).
>
>:)
>
>And Alekhine's Defence appears as
>
> 1...Nf6??
>
>:)
>
>Who am I to argue?
>
>
>>No idea who suggested this book to you?
>
>
>It is the book that apparently favoured Fruit 2.1 in various tournaments at
>http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lefouduroi/tournois/tournois43.htm
>and other sites.
>I found that link and the book through various people's recommendation here.
>
>Since the SEARCH function on this board seems to work only in a parallel
>universe, I cannot help you further.
>
>My experiments with Fruit 2.2.1 vs other strong engines have been performed with
>Fruit using that Fruit_ASv3.ctg book, and the book did Fruit no harm at all.
>
>
>
>>(I guess this means that your *ctg book also already was polluted
>>with your teaching attempts?)
>
>
>No, see above.  It comes pre-polluted with "1...N-c6!!"
>
>:)
>
>
>>Guenther
>
>Best,
>
>A.S.

Don't trust all what you read in the net, please try again with
Fruits 2.21 native book by Marc Lacrosse, which came with the
download.

If you see something like 1...Nc6!! you should be already
alarmed(and you were as you wrote) ;)

Guenther



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.