Author: Peter Kasinski
Date: 04:07:56 03/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 1999 at 02:11:40, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On March 21, 1999 at 00:36:02, Ed Schröder wrote: > > >>Right. Use Rebel10.0c for playing comp-comp and 10.0b if your main >>interest is analysis, playing own games and study chess. >> >>Ed Schroder > > >So are you saying that Rebel 10c if I upgraded to it is not as good as Rebel 10b >for analysing. > >If so how much weaker in playing is Rebel 10c to Rebel 10b when playing against >humans. > >I hope I only read your post the wrong way, because if you made an upgrade that >was weaker against humans but stronger against computers than I think you have >priorities around the wrong way. Lets hope it is not so. I think Ed's priorities are ok. Two quite different engines (and not through tweaking some weights), each with a clearly stated purpose, all for the price of one - what's wrong with that? 10c adds a feature to a very good program. Turn it on only if you want to. PK.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.