Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 16:50:10 11/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2005 at 19:32:01, Uri Blass wrote: >I do not claim that it is important if he is Chris W or another member and in >most of my posts I did not discuss it and I simply responded to a post that was >about his playing strength. > >When you talk about his playing strength the question who is the poster is >clearly relevant. > >Uri But Sune's and my point was if you followed your own chess judgement and tried to communicate with such a guy or do you wait for the information about titles and do you THEN start to analyse what he was saying all the time? "Our" thesis was that the chess is more important than just names and titles. - One thing however should be clear, everytime people misjudge an expert unless they dont get the exact data of his references they show their lack of understanding. I think the class of arguments speaks for itself and doesn't need the ornaments of titles. That is a common Rule also outside of chess. But in chess it's so well measurable.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.