Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Naming Suspected Computer Cheats could be considered slanderous

Author: Micheal Cummings

Date: 23:15:59 03/23/99

Go up one level in this thread


Odell my friend, you seem to be missing the point.

No one is defending this suspected cheat against what he did. We (as in me and
others against you naming this person in this forum) are against you using this
forum for your own personal crusade and revenge against this person that beat
you.

If he used a computer which when you look at the game shows that it is very
likely that he did use a computer rather than his own brain, then sure this
person using this game as an example could have cheated. But Odell that is not
the point. The point is you can show us the games, you can tell us you played
him on ICC, but what we are saying is that under no circumstances before ICC has
booted this player should you name him.

See Odell he is using ICC as his portal for cheating, then once ICC boots this
person you can come on here and say that this person was cought cheating by ICC
and that he beat you using unfair means. But until then this player is still a
member of the chess server and until any cheating has been confirmed by ICC then
you should keep you mouth shut.

If you want to make a crusade to prove this person is cheating, hassle the
admins of the chess server till they do something about it. Cause really posting
who he is on here is really not going to do much for you and for him.

Are you looking for sympathy because you got cheated out of a game of chess.
Well I am sorry for you.

I really think you are looking to prove that you deserve to beat this person and
when you did not, you have to go on a mission to prove you are better than him
and thus you are using and ABUSING this forum for your own means.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.