Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No need for moderation

Author: Graham Banks

Date: 09:49:27 12/07/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 07, 2005 at 05:41:57, Ryan Peters wrote:

>On December 07, 2005 at 05:33:03, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On December 07, 2005 at 04:52:06, Ryan Peters wrote:
>>
>>>On December 07, 2005 at 00:36:59, Graham Banks wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 06, 2005 at 23:28:06, Sherry Windsor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On December 06, 2005 at 23:11:38, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>results of more matches
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Rybka(2 plies)-Movei(4 plies) 12.5-7.5
>>>>>>Rybka(3 plies)-Movei(5 plies) 7.5-12.5
>>>>>>Rybka(4 plies)-Movei(6 plies) 11-9
>>>>>>Rybka(5 plies)-Movei(7 plies) 10.5-9.5
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yeah Right Uri, you are just fantasizing that you're program would ever have a
>>>>>chance to draw any top program especially Rybka
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hello Sherry,
>>>>
>>>>such comments are uncalled for and just downright rude! Please be more
>>>>constructive in future,
>>>>
>>>>Regards, Graham (moderation team)
>>>
>>>
>>>I see nothing wrong with Sherry's post.. or anything necessarily rude about it.
>>>If moderation is getting involved here, then you have a lot more work to do if
>>>you want to be consistent in this forum.
>>
>>You're kidding right? IMO the post should have been removed what comments did it
>>add to Uri's post? Nothing is the answer. So like this one of mine and yours
>>just more spam.
>>
>>Sarah.
>
>You have a point. But if that is the criteria for moderation intervention then
>this forum is in serious need of major moderation "cleansing". In my view this
>is selective moderation for reasons which I will keep to myself.



Hmmm - a conspiracy theory. LOL
This I'm most interested in hearing about! You obviously don't know me very
well.

Graham.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.