Author: Dagh Nielsen
Date: 13:46:33 12/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 07, 2005 at 16:11:16, Stephen Ham wrote: Snip. >We already have evidence that engines >that dominate at blitz chess are not necessarily dominant at classical times >controls, or vice versa. > >All the best, > >Steve > What evidence, if I may ask? AFAIK, pracically all evidence suggests that there is indeed a very strong correlation between performance in blitz play and performance in slow play, with very few and fairly insignificant exceptions. Just check the CEGT blitz list and compare it to the "slow" list! I have no beef with the rest of your post. Regards, Dagh Nielsen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.