Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 04:52:17 12/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2005 at 18:27:01, Claude Le Page wrote: >Sevral posts have noticed that Rybka is rather weak in endgames ,especially >against Junior : this put me on apossible track : when its position is not >clearly better , a Juhior engine uses its fastness to complicate , and Rybka >must follow at maximum depth ,what is very costly in time : so , in endgame , >Rybka is in zeitnot , and analyzes only at depth 13 where thr other is at depth >17 >The same happens between Junior and Hiarcs : Their Knowledge slowen hem too >much in front of engines that use long calculated lines >The same seem to happen vs TogaII 1.1a , whose style is similar to Juniors >Could this be a possible explanation? I am expecting Rybka to be quite strong in the endgames too soon. I do not think that who made this program has problems to improve the endgames...it is just a matter of investing time on it. Give it a good book and the problems on the endgames will be less as winning most games before. Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.