Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty

Author: Vasik Rajlich

Date: 11:52:41 12/09/05

Go up one level in this thread

On December 09, 2005 at 11:50:42, William Penn wrote:

>Rybka's analysis is fairly short to begin with, compared to most other engines.
>It reaches its maximum after a few seconds, then it decreases at longer times.
>For example here's an analysis of a position in infinite mode using the Shredder
>Classic GUI. After 3 hours it is already showing a decrease of move information,
>which decreases even further after 10 hours. The specific position doesn't
>matter. I see this same pattern when analyzing any position for a long time.
>
>Engine: Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit (704 MB) by Vasik Rajlich
>12.01  0:03   +1.35    32.h4 g4 33.h5 Qf8 34.Qe2 Nb4 35.Rh4 Qe8 36.Ne3 (300.979)
>87
>13.01  0:06   +1.37    32.h4 g4 33.h5 Qf8 34.Qe2 Nb4 35.Rh4 Qe8 36.Ne3 Qe6
>(552.306) 90
>14.01  0:15   +1.36    32.h4 g4 33.h5 Qf8 34.Qe2 Nb4 35.h6 Qf7 36.Qd2 Qe6
>(1.362.839) 90
>15.01  2:02   +1.34    32.h4 Qf8 33.hxg5 Rxg5 34.Qf3 Nc7 35.Rh5 Ne6 36.Rxg5 fxg5
>(9.586.923) 80
>16.01  3:01   +1.31    32.h4 Qf8 33.hxg5 Rxg5 34.Qf3 Nc7 35.Rh5 Ne6 36.Rxg5 fxg5
>(14.741.441) 83
>17.01  5:30   +1.27    32.h4 Qf8 33.hxg5 Rxg5 34.Qf3 Nc7 35.Rh5 Qg8 36.Rh4 Ne6
>(27.355.485) 84
>18.01  10:34  +1.19    32.h4 Qf8 33.hxg5 Rxg5 34.Qf3 Nc7 35.Rh5 Qg8 36.Rh4 Rg6
>(52.200.357) 84
>19.01  18:28  +1.25    32.h4 Qf8 33.hxg5 Rxg5 34.Qf3 Nc7 35.Rh5 Qg8 36.Rh4 Rg6
>(90.818.525) 83
>20.01  42:12  +1.13    32.h4 Qf8 33.hxg5 Rxg5 34.Qf3 Nc7 35.Rh5 Qg8 36.Rah1 Ne6
>(200.052.005) 80
>21.01  92:04  +1.18    32.h4 Qf8 33.hxg5 Rxg5 34.Qf3 Nc7 35.Rh5 Qg8 36.Rah1 Ne6
>(427.366.814) 79
>22.01  174:11 +1.14    32.h4 Qf8 33.hxg5 Rxg5 34.Qf3 Nc7 (789.072.165) 77
>23.01  634:58 +1.24    32.h4 Qf8 33.hxg5 (2.860.235.585) 76
>
>WP

This is intentional and can _very_ easily be fixed. Please send me an email if
you have a strong opinion about the matter.

In my opinion, other engines talk too much. The ends of the PVs tend to be
pretty silly.

Vas

• Done. Thanks! (n/t) William Penn 15:02:07 12/09/05
• Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Uri Blass 12:24:03 12/09/05
  • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Vasik Rajlich 02:24:19 12/10/05
    • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Oreopoulos Kostas 11:45:54 12/10/05
    • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Uri Blass 04:57:16 12/10/05
      • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Vasik Rajlich 10:04:12 12/10/05
    • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Tord Romstad 03:33:42 12/10/05
      • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Vasik Rajlich 10:25:12 12/10/05
        • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Tord Romstad 01:26:48 12/11/05
  • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty J.Dufek 12:53:42 12/09/05
    • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Uri Blass 13:31:53 12/09/05
      • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty J.Dufek 13:24:38 12/10/05
      • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty J.Dufek 13:21:47 12/10/05
        • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Uri Blass 14:05:19 12/10/05
          • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty J.Dufek 14:24:14 12/10/05
            • Re: Rybka's analysis is scanty Uri Blass 15:10:21 12/10/05

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.