Author: Uri Blass
Date: 17:59:11 12/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2005 at 20:49:26, Ed Murak wrote: >On December 09, 2005 at 20:26:19, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 09, 2005 at 19:59:28, Ed Murak wrote: >> >>>On December 09, 2005 at 19:31:30, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>Not giving it to people is clearly against the wish of a lot of people who are >>>>interested in getting it. >>> >>>If that thinking was adopted as a general philosophy (which I know you have not >>>said), have you considered what sort of world it would swiftly produce? >>> >>>Is that the sort of world you want? >> >>I do not know but it is possible that a world without author rights may be >>better world for most people. > > >To divorce author rights from other property rights is infeasible for legal and >also other logical reasons. No It is clearly logical The difference is the following difference: one car more for one person is one car less for another person. one program more for one person is not one program less for another person. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.