Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Thanks

Author: Ed Murak

Date: 22:14:59 12/10/05

Go up one level in this thread

On December 11, 2005 at 00:43:45, William Penn wrote:

>On December 11, 2005 at 00:42:36, William Penn wrote:
>
>>Midnight December 11, 2005 GMT has already come and gone. It happened about 5
>>hours and 18 minutes prior to this post.
>>WP
>correction: 5 hours and 43 minutes

That is assuming:

- Norm Pollock was right and it is definitely the 10-11 and not the 11-12
"midnight Dec 11"; I have checked the web and think my original surmise of
_somewhat ambiguous_ is correct.  See-
http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?468907

- the timezone was UT or GMT?  Who said that? Could be another c5 hours (zone
correction) plus 24 hours (the other interpretation of midnight) = c29 hours

Don't wait up. ;-)

• Re: Thanks Graham Banks 22:35:16 12/10/05
  • Re: Thanks Ed Murak 00:13:36 12/11/05
    • Off-topic interesting time question Norm Pollock 06:30:27 12/11/05
      • Answer-Off-topic interesting time question Norm Pollock 06:42:01 12/11/05
        • Yes, I already answered you correctly - check the board. Also, request. Ed Murak 10:07:23 12/11/05
      • Re: Off-topic interesting time question Ed Murak 06:41:34 12/11/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.