Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why is this surprising?

Author: Sandro Necchi

Date: 11:45:37 12/11/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 11, 2005 at 14:08:53, Bouddha wrote:

>Thanks Sandro.
>
>by the way, an interesting question for me, according to you how is Rybka style
>?
>
>Tactical, agressif, positional, activ etc.... ????
>
>I have difficulty to define Rybka style, exept maybe activ, but this is a bit
>weak definition.
>
>Does Rybka play good sicilians or spanish with black against 1.e4 ?
>Does fits best with black for Rybka after 1.d4 ?

It depends on the setting...I am still studying it...

>
>and with white, would should Rybka play, 1.e4 or 1.d4 ?

seems better with 1. d4, but than it depends on the follwing moves too...

>
>I know both could be good as Rybka plays very well and because you can have many
>different positions after 1.d4 or 1.e4

yes

>
>regards

Sandro



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.