Author: Marc Lacrosse
Date: 03:22:25 12/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2005 at 01:00:50, Sandro Necchi wrote: >I am getting fun making books, so I have made one in 10 minutes on Rybka and >looking what happens...am I allowed to do so? I think so. > Sure you are. But I am feeling equally allowed to have a critical opinion on the way you tell the story, as nobody else than you decided to have a public discussion on this topic. Weren't you the one who initiated the thread? The title of your initial post was "Rybka book made just for fun and the program...oustanding result!". Anybody would have opened it with the feeling that you had contributed a significant improvement to rybka already impressive results with your "made for fun" book. And then discovering that this superlative title was for a mere four games match was a bit surprising when there are already reports for hundreds of Rybka games. A four games match has no signification. How can this result be an "outstanding result!" (with an exclamation mark)? >I did not make any comments on you and your work, why are you on mine? When _you_ decide to publish results in a public forum and when _you_ describe these results as outstanding, nobody could have a diverging opinion ? >Do you want to start a war? Not at all. If you initiate a thread, do not be surprised that it is possible that someone will not agree with your opinion. Moreover you posted more on this topic in a couple of days (19 posts by you in the same thread in less than two days) than on your whole book-cooking work during the last six months. I just sent two posts in the same time... I would prefer getting news on your ongoing progresses with shredder 9 ans 10. Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.