Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: are the best programmers getting rich (as they deserve)

Author: Mike Hood

Date: 21:10:57 12/12/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2005 at 00:03:18, Uri Blass wrote:

>On December 12, 2005 at 23:48:30, Jay Urbanski wrote:
>
>>On December 12, 2005 at 21:56:51, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>>
>>>There are not cases of chess programmers becoming rich. The one that best
>>>organized his efforts, with a company of his own, great products, good machinery
>>>of selling and distribution and a lot of years persevering in his work and
>>>creating a pool of customers was Ed Schroeder and I believe he did not become
>>>rich.
>>>Rich; I mean a man with one million dollars or more in the bank account.
>>>Chris Wittington perhaps approached that definition, but he did not get his
>>>money selling chess programs, but selling a full company.
>>>
>>>By now, with so many available options, I doub very much Fabien or Anthony or
>>>Vasas will be capable of selling more than couple of hundreds of programs. 3
>>>hundred at most. The general chess market is tiny and 99% of it does not know a
>>>shit about them. They know about Chessmaster and Chessbase products, but not of
>>>engines for the so called " professional market".
>>>
>>>So, no, they does not becomes rich people. None. Not even they could earn a
>>>living with it these days. At most they add some extra buck to his budgets on
>>>beer and a shunk of glory.
>>>
>>>My best
>>>fernando
>>
>>
>>$1,000,000 in the bank is not "rich" - at best it is comfortable.  Assuming 10%
>>return per year (an optimistic assumption), that's only $100,000 a year without
>>touching the capital.  Comfortable, mabye... but hardly "rich".
>
>It is dependent on the definition of rich and
>I do not agree with your definition.
>
>Uri

To quote something I read in a Christmas cracker:

"The man is richest whose pleasures are cheapest"

It's difficult to say when you're rich, because the definition of "rich" is
fuzzy. It's easier to say when you're not rich. I know I'm not rich if there's
something I want to do, and I can't do it because I don't have enough money.
Maybe I can't afford a new house, maybe I can't afford a new car, or maybe I
can't afford Fritz 9. If I have to do without something for money reasons I'm
not rich.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.