Author: Günther Simon
Date: 00:35:07 12/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2005 at 01:57:01, Graham Banks wrote: >On December 13, 2005 at 01:21:34, Ed Murak wrote: > >>On December 12, 2005 at 14:34:30, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: >> >>>Hello Vasik, >>> >>>after some review work from some experts here, >>>i must send you my apology ! Sorry about my posting about Rybka >>>and congrats to a so strong engine. >>>Its seems to be i was dazzled from some moves and outputs. >>> >>>Sorry! >>> >>>Best, >>>Daniel >> >> >>Daniel, >> >>Always best to apologize when wrong, well done, IMO. If only all people could >>follow your example. Usually they do not. >> >>Your kind message above has been sent to Mr Rajlich, who I am sure could be >>relieved he didn't do anything wrong. He knew that already, of course. :) >> >>But could I make a little suggestion, purely voluntarily on your part, which >>could even be viewed as a favor or request just from me (a total nobody) and no >>one else? >> >>The original suggestion, theory or even accusation as some could have read it, >>by you appeared in- >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?469130 >>The best way to retract, IMO, is for you to post a _reply_ to that i.e. to your >>own original message, with a SHOUTING subject:, something like: >> "SORRY, I MADE A MISTAKE! PLEASE IGNORE THIS THREAD" >>Daniel, this is only my suggestion... you can do it or not. As a programmer >>yourself, you can imagine that it can be hurtful to read incorrect things about >>one's work. :) >> >>I have got very good news for you and everyone. In my play of the latest Rybka >>test, it is leading (at 40/40+40/40+40, opening book Fritz9.ctg for both, modern >>PC) against Fritz 9 by a huge margin! Right now, game 12 is being played (each >>opening is played twice with the usual reversal), and the score to RYBKA is >>+8 =2 -1 which is almost unbelievable. That is 81.8%, +261 ELO T.P. >>The RYBKA is Beta version latest, released versions will be much better because >>of endgame knowledge being added and EGTB support and other things. Fritz 9 was >>playing with full 3/4/5 EGTBs, even many 6 ones but I forget whether it looks at >>those. >>Of course the match is too short, but 81.8%... eh? >>I may post in CCC the interim results and of course all the PGN when more games >>are played. >> >>Thanks for your time. > > > >Hi Ed, > >we do not encourage members to "shout" (posting messages with caps lock on)in >this forum. > >Regards, Graham. ...and probably also not to send around CCC messages via e-mail to unknown persons, who read here anyway. Regards, Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.