Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 01:23:46 12/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
May be because of margin error, I tend to don't believe matchs between 2 engines if they last less than 100 games. How many did you play ? On December 13, 2005 at 02:51:35, Ed Murak wrote: >On December 13, 2005 at 02:16:50, Chrilly Donninger wrote: > >>One conclusion of my experiment is: Rybka seems to be fairly tuned against >>Shredder. > > >Actually, I see the opposite. RYBKA (latest) has more problems versus Shredder >9 than against another "obvious" leader, Fritz 9. > >Games: 40/40+40/40+40 >Opening book: Fritz9.ctg for both, clean >Hash: 512 Mb each >PC: Intel 3600+ Mhz, 32-bit OS >EGTBs: Full 3/4/5 EGTBs (+ some 6 ones, but Fritz9 I think doesn't look at >these) > >Note this is the RYBKA without proper endgame knowledge still, and without EGTB >access at all. > >The result so far is: > >Rybka (beta4, 32 bit) v. Fritz 9 > +8 =3 -1 > >That is 79.1%, with a TP of +231 ELO, even without endgame tweaks and EGTB for >RYBKA. Basically F9 isn't making it into the EG with both legs attached too >often. :) > >Performance vs Fruit 2.2.1 is almost as high, >75% which I believe could have >been thought impossible. > >Of course, here 12 is far too small a number of games. > >I may post in CCC the results and of course all the PGN when more games >are played. > >But this (Fritz 9 and Fruit 2.2.1 results against RYBKA b4) runs a little >contrary to Chrilly's (possible) conclusion of special RYBKA v. Shredder tuning, >maybe. Unless when Shredder comes back round the loop for a match, RYBKA scores >90% or something! :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.