Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 04:05:49 12/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2005 at 05:43:45, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On December 13, 2005 at 05:04:08, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On December 13, 2005 at 03:58:50, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On December 13, 2005 at 02:16:50, Chrilly Donninger wrote: >>> >>>[...] >>>>The experiment shows also, that it is fairly easy to tune against one programm. >>>>The problem is to find a solution which works against all. >>>> >>>>Chrilly >>> >>> Hi Chrilly >>> This conforms exactly with my own experience when >>> trying different CM-personalities: the best CM-setting >>> vs Shredder had no chance vs Fritz and so on. >>> Kind regards >>> Kurt >> >> >>Hi Kurt, >> >>I'm surprised by this. I had the impression tuning against a specific opponent >>yields only little. Do you have any data on your experience for this? >> >>Joachim >> >>Joachim > > Hi Joachim > We have tried hundreds of different CM9-settings > without tuning them vs a specific engine. But we > noticed that setting X played excellent vs for > example Shredder but lost badly vs Chess Tiger > and/or other combinations. Such things always > happened with settings where we tried to increase/decrease > some parameters to the extreme. All such settings did never > well and were unsuitable as a good overall setting. > Regards > Kurt Did you have such "anomalities" with matches for more than 50 games? I mean if you play 10 matches of 50 games chances are high that one match will have a "curious" result, such as your result of Fritz 9 against Fruit-Toga 1.0. Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.