Author: Sherry Windsor
Date: 13:47:51 12/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2005 at 16:41:05, Tord Romstad wrote: >On December 13, 2005 at 16:20:53, Sherry Windsor wrote: > >> Why Post a game where hiarcs plays such a weak opponent you're right this >>proves nothing > >Well, I play this match partly out of curiousity, and partly because the games >and results will be useful to me. I post the results because there may be a >tiny chance that someone out there may find them interesting. After all, >there are a big number of Hiarcs fans on this forum, and a much smaller, >but still nontrivial number of people who are for some reason interested >in my own engine. Those who are not interested can just refrain from >reading, and at least make sure not to reply and quote all the text just >to add a single sentence of their own. > >I agree that my post wasn't among the most interesting things ever posted >to the CCC, but it is (sad to say) also lightyears away from the other end of >the scale. I could mention posters whose entire body of contributions to >the CCC are more worthless than the first two games of my Hiarcs vs Glaurung >match. > >Tord My apologies Sir, I didn't realize it was your engine. Must not be to weak if it can Draw Hiarcs 10 ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.