Author: Tom Likens
Date: 14:16:19 12/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2005 at 16:41:05, Tord Romstad wrote: >On December 13, 2005 at 16:20:53, Sherry Windsor wrote: > >> Why Post a game where hiarcs plays such a weak opponent you're right this >>proves nothing > >Well, I play this match partly out of curiousity, and partly because the games >and results will be useful to me. I post the results because there may be a >tiny chance that someone out there may find them interesting. After all, >there are a big number of Hiarcs fans on this forum, and a much smaller, >but still nontrivial number of people who are for some reason interested >in my own engine. Those who are not interested can just refrain from >reading, and at least make sure not to reply and quote all the text just >to add a single sentence of their own. > >I agree that my post wasn't among the most interesting things ever posted >to the CCC, but it is (sad to say) also lightyears away from the other end of >the scale. I could mention posters whose entire body of contributions to >the CCC are more worthless than the first two games of my Hiarcs vs Glaurung >match. > >Tord Yes, but what does *any* of this have to do with Rybka??? ;-) ;-) Sorry, Tord I couldn't resist!! BTW, my friend if anyone deserves to post whatever they feel like here it's you. You're one of the few contributors to the forum that I *always* read. Anyway, don't let it get you down--one of these days we'll start talking about computer chess programming again! Until then of course, I simply can't get enough of the umpteenth CM personality or what are the optimal hash table settings for program X. The signal to noise ratio is extremely low these days. take care, --tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.