Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Any games between Rybka and Hiarcs 10? [Moderation]

Author: Zappa

Date: 19:26:57 12/13/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2005 at 20:43:22, Sherry Windsor wrote:

>On December 13, 2005 at 20:25:54, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>On December 13, 2005 at 20:09:31, Sherry Windsor wrote:
>>
>>>On December 13, 2005 at 20:07:08, Ryan B. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 13, 2005 at 19:59:10, Sherry Windsor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On December 13, 2005 at 19:54:57, Graham Banks wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I've deleted several inappropriate posts from Sherry Windsor and the moderation
>>>>>>team will discuss this further later seeing as she's had a previous warning.
>>>>>>I've also deleted some of the responses to Sherry's posts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Graham (moderation team)
>>>>>
>>>>>All I said was Hiarcs Sucks! This is a very common Metaphor in America, you will
>>>>>find politicians, ect, using it. Its the same as saying I think Hiarcs plays
>>>>>bad. So why would you delete such a post? It is not a personal attack on anyone
>>>>>and simply express an Opinion . Don't you think you are going overboard we are
>>>>>not children.
>>>>
>>>>You have said unkind things about multiple chess projects that are well
>>>>respected and done my respectful programmers who are also helpfully to other
>>>>programmers here.  Please be respectful to peoples hard work here.  Also it is
>>>>unwise to question the moderators.  Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>Ryan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Yeah you are right I should know better, two things you should never do here,
>>>is question all wise , all knowing programmers, and never Question the
>>>moderators who are always right!! sorry.
>>
>>Maybe you are new to internet forums (special interest ones), and it still seem
>>a bit unreal to you.
>>Anyway, of course, you may "question" programmers. But you should imagine you
>>are sitting right opposite them, too, and how they might feel. Some of them have
>>their livelihood at stake, too. That doesn't mean that you are working for them,
>>or that your post should affect things, and even if it does, it shouldn't be
>>your problem. But you would understand that they might get a bit nervous,
>>because the onus is on them to answer your post, and they should be a bit like a
>>protected species, when they go on show in the forum. AND, your post CAN make
>>some people decide "Well? oh no, ok, so I won't buy this one", because of an
>>unreasoned outburst about the particular program. And, it's not fair to expect a
>>programmer to protect himself each time this is done, when there is nothing
>>factual to which he can reply.
>>S.Taylor
>
>
>Okay S. Taylor
>
>
> Your post sounds very reasonable I admitt. But You have to remember Hiarcs is a
>very established Program with Professional Chessplayers having given it praise,
>Surely my little comment about it sucking isn't going to hurt the Programmers
>Feeling give me a break. If you were referring to somethingelse let me know.

"Hiarcs sux" is a junior high level comment.  It contributes absolutely no
intellectual content to this forum.  No information other than your not
particularly highly regarded opinion.  Nor is it even humorous, like my jab at
you in the previous paragraph.  In other words, it is simply a waste of bits.

anthony



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.