Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 02:12:11 12/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2005 at 13:24:56, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On December 20, 2005 at 04:19:42, Vasik Rajlich wrote: > >>On December 20, 2005 at 00:53:05, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On December 19, 2005 at 17:43:36, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >>> >>>>Has anyone taken Ryba on a Pentium 4 or some other well-known-cpu >>>>and run it through any of the computer chess rating test suites? >>>> >>>>Stuart >>> >>> >>> Hi Stuart >>> Rybka does not like test suites with the analysis mode. >>> Its strength lies in playing games I can assure you. >>> Rybka is at the moment the strongest available chess >>> engine in engine/engine-matches but does not very well >>> in test suites, just funny. >>> Best regards >>> Kurt >> >>I'm going to add a special "testsuite" mode to the 1.2 release as a user option, >>it's not hard to do. That mode should be competitive with all other engines in >>testsuite-type tactics. >> >>Vas > > Can I take from this comments that there is actually > a difference in how Rybka is working depending on > whether we play games or use the analysis mode? > BTW: we are still testing Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit > and have excellent results with your fine engine > http://www.utzingerk.com/rybka10beta_test.htm > and no doubt will also buy the next version of > your program. > Best regards > Kurt Kurt, analysis and playing mode are the same (and will remain the same). I will add an engine option which the user can select which will cause the engine to perform better on testsuites (and worse in games). Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.