Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 02:24:55 12/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2005 at 10:12:54, Heinz van Kempen wrote: > >>My Nunn2 testing, as published here at CCC, suggests that the SP (slightly >>positional) setting might yield slightly better results. My sample is not large, >>160 games for each setting, and doesn't include the VT setting at all. >> >> Albert >> > >Hi Albert, > >Wilhelm Hudetz played a lot of Blitz games with the settings and those also >indicate that SP might be the strongest. So far not tested in CEGT 40/40. > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/eloblitz.html > >Best Regards >Heinz Heinz (and Albert), thanks very much for testing this. I will put this data together when we are deciding about Rybka 1.2. I can add that VP can be at most 6 or 7 rating points better than SP, while there isn't really any limit going in the other direction. SP performs an additional "tactical check" which causes a slowdown of around 10-12%. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.