Author: Roger Brown
Date: 08:24:27 12/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
>I am not attacking Thomas Gakasch, by the way. He was wrong to >initially try to hide the fact that Toga was a Fruit clone, but I accept >his apology. What I attack are the insane misinterpretations of >history which you and Eduard present as truths. Attentive readers >will notice that Thomas himself never makes such claims. I agree about the position that Thomas has taken. Also I find Ryan B's (Gambit Fruit) position quite classy and he is under no illusions about the importance of the Fruit code to his engine. This is how it should be done. From the readme: "Clean up my bugs added to Fabians great code. Thank you to Fabian for Fruit 2.1, Thomas for Toga, and to Bryan Hofmann for the window compile. " What is the difficulty in recognising that Fruit was the structure within which other persons removed a beam here or a wall there? :-) Later.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.