Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 02:19:19 12/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2005 at 21:51:21, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 23, 2005 at 20:25:19, Vasik Rajlich wrote: > >>On December 22, 2005 at 18:30:28, William Penn wrote: >> >>>Sorry, I posted the wrong position. Here is the correct one: >>>[D]r2q4/1p1P3p/2p3pk/P7/8/4Q3/6PP/3R2K1 b - - >>>I let that first test run for over 124 minutes, but no joy. It was hung. >>>Then I restarted my computer and tried again (see below). Same thing, it's >>>definitely hanging. >>>So it looks like I'll be reverting to the 1.0 version. >>> >>>CPU0: AuthenticAMD x86 Family 6 Model 8 Stepping 1 1998 MHz >>>GUI: Tablebases with 5 pieces found! [Cache: 16 MB + internal 10.31 MB] >>>Engine: Rybka 1.01 Preview 2 32-bit (704 MB) >>>by Vasik Rajlich >>> 3.00 0:00 -1.76 36...Kg7 (5.389) 114 >>> 4.00 0:00 -1.92 36...Kg7 (9.105) 118 >>> 5.00 0:00 -2.07 36...Kg7 37.Qd4+ Kh6 (7.660) 62 >>> 6.00 0:00 -2.18 36...Kg7 37.Qd4+ Kg8 38.Re1 (24.701) 100 >>> 7.00 0:00 -2.55 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Kg8 38.Qe6+ Kg7 39.Rf1 (39.294) 107 >>> 8.00 0:00 -3.79 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Kg8 38.Qe6+ Kh8 39.Rf1 b6 (78.468) 116 >>> 9.00 0:00 -4.82 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Kg8 38.Qe6+ Kh8 39.Rf1 Qxa5 40.Qf6+ Kg8 >>>41.Qf7+ Kh8 42.Qe8+ Kg7 (101.631) 120 >>> 10.00 0:01 -6.29 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Qf6 38.Qxf6+ Kxf6 39.d8Q+ Rxd8 40.Rxd8 c5 >>>41.Rb8 Ke6 42.Rxb7 Kd6 43.Rxh7 (290.685) 149 >>> 11.01 0:08 -7.17 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Qf6 38.Qxf6+ Kxf6 39.d8Q+ Rxd8 40.Rxd8 c5 >>>41.Rb8 h5 42.Rxb7 c4 43.Rb6+ (1.307.096) 158 >>> 12.01 0:10 -7.23 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Qf6 38.Qxf6+ Kxf6 39.d8Q+ Rxd8 40.Rxd8 c5 >>>41.Rb8 c4 42.Rxb7 c3 43.Rxh7 (1.672.331) 159 >>> 13.01 0:18 -9.28 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Kg8 38.Qe6+ Kh8 39.Rf1 Qxa5 40.Qf6+ Kg8 >>>41.Qf7+ Kh8 42.Qe8+ Kg7 43.Rf7+ (2.961.282) 165 >>> 14.01 0:29 -10.12 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Kg8 38.Qe6+ Kh8 39.Rf1 Qxa5 40.Qf6+ Kg8 >>>41.Qf7+ Kh8 42.Qe8+ Kg7 43.Rf7+ (4.699.288) 165 >>> 15.01 0:42 -10.12 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Kg8 38.Qe6+ Kh8 39.Rf1 Qxa5 40.Qf6+ Kg8 >>>41.Qf7+ Kh8 42.Qe8+ Kg7 43.Rf7+ (6.657.777) 160 >>> 16.01 1:10 -10.18 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Kg8 38.Qe6+ Kh8 39.Rf1 Qxa5 40.Qf6+ Kg8 >>>41.Qf7+ Kh8 42.Qe8+ Kg7 43.Rf7+ (10.648.036) 155 >>> 17.01 3:15 -11.03 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Kg8 38.Qe6+ Kh8 39.Rf1 Qxa5 40.Qf6+ Kg8 >>>41.Qf7+ Kh8 42.Qe8+ Kg7 43.Rf7+ (28.632.692) 149 >>> 18.01 5:26 -11.03 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Kg8 38.Qe6+ Kh8 39.Rf1 Qxa5 40.Qf6+ Kg8 >>>41.Qf7+ Kh8 42.Qe8+ Kg7 43.Rf7+ (46.837.423) 147 >>> 19.01 9:06 -11.09 36...Kg7 37.Qe5+ Kg8 38.Qe6+ Kh8 39.Rf1 Qxa5 40.Qf6+ Kg8 >>>41.Qf7+ Kh8 42.Qe8+ Kg7 43.Rf7+ (80.727.798) 151 >>>best move: Kh6-g7 time: 171:55.969 min n/s: 14.320 nodes: 144.239.616 >>> >>>WP >> >>William, >> >>you should always be able to stop the analysis by just moving to a different >>position. If not, then there is a bug there which I am not yet aware of. >> >>Vas > >Note that rybka beta with the same hash has no problem to get depth 20 >If Rybka preview does not get it in a reasonable time then there is a problem > >New game >r2q4/1p1P3p/2p3pk/P7/8/4Q3/6PP/3R2K1 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit: > >1...Kg7 > +- (1.87) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >1...Kg7 > +- (1.98) Depth: 4 00:00:00 >1...Kg7 2.Qc3+ Kh6 > +- (2.07) Depth: 5 00:00:00 >1...Kg7 2.Qc3+ Kh6 3.Qb4 > +- (2.07) Depth: 6 00:00:00 8kN >1...Kg7 2.Qc3+ Kh6 3.Qc1+ g5 4.Qb2 > +- (2.75) Depth: 7 00:00:00 25kN >1...Kg7 2.Qc3+ Kg8 3.Qb3+ Kg7 4.Qb2+ Kf7 5.Rf1+ Ke6 > +- (4.00) Depth: 8 00:00:01 46kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Kg8 3.Qe6+ Kg7 4.Rf1 Qxa5 5.Rf7+ Kh6 > +- (4.82) Depth: 9 00:00:01 73kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Qf6 3.Qxf6+ Kxf6 4.d8Q+ Rxd8 5.Rxd8 Ke7 6.Rd3 > +- (6.23) Depth: 10 00:00:03 271kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Qf6 3.Qxf6+ Kxf6 4.d8Q+ Rxd8 5.Rxd8 h6 6.Rd7 > +- (7.17) Depth: 11 00:00:05 540kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Qf6 3.Qxf6+ Kxf6 4.d8Q+ Rxd8 5.Rxd8 c5 6.Rd7 > +- (7.17) Depth: 12 00:00:13 1099kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Kg8 3.Qe6+ Kg7 4.Rf1 Qxa5 5.Rf7+ Kh6 6.Qe3+ > +- (9.28) Depth: 13 00:00:19 1707kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Kg8 3.Qe6+ Kg7 4.Rf1 Qxa5 5.Rf7+ Kh6 6.Qe3+ > +- (10.12) Depth: 14 00:00:28 2279kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Kg8 3.Qe6+ Kg7 4.Rf1 Qxa5 5.Rf7+ Kh6 6.Qe3+ > +- (10.12) Depth: 15 00:00:39 2908kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Kg8 3.Qe6+ Kg7 4.Rf1 Qxa5 5.Rf7+ Kh6 6.Qe3+ > +- (10.18) Depth: 16 00:01:03 4027kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Kg8 3.Qe6+ Kg7 4.Rf1 Qxa5 5.Rf7+ Kh6 6.Qe3+ > +- (11.03) Depth: 17 00:01:56 6815kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Kg8 3.Qe6+ Kg7 4.Rf1 Qxa5 5.Rf7+ Kh6 6.Qe3+ > +- (11.03) Depth: 18 00:04:05 12957kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Kg8 3.Qe6+ Kg7 4.Rf1 Qxa5 5.Rf7+ Kh6 6.Qe3+ > +- (11.09) Depth: 19 00:07:46 23502kN >1...Kg7 2.Qe5+ Kg8 3.Qe6+ Kg7 4.Rf1 Qxa5 5.Rf7+ Kh6 6.Qe3+ > +- (11.94) Depth: 20 00:16:42 49807kN > >(, 24.12.2005) Yes, but this is a known problem :) The new version is very inefficiently resolving mates. The Beta does not resolve mates at all. Rybka 1.1 will resolve mates, but more efficiently. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.