Author: Ryan B.
Date: 13:28:30 12/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2005 at 12:07:51, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On December 27, 2005 at 12:04:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On December 27, 2005 at 11:58:37, chris matheson wrote: >> >>>And yet it is still squashing all other programs in long matches-go figure. >>>Can't wait until those issues are corrected. Sorry, just speaking the truth. >> >> >>No doubt about it that we'll have a lot of fun in the near future. But it's also >>important to become realistic in times of highest elation. We know this since >>long that a chess IM has no particular advantage in computerchess programming >>and that wont change in a couple of hours or days... Take my words for that >>truth. :) > >You are talking about things that you didn´t understand. Why it is no advantage >to implement chessknowledge which other programmers didn´t know that it exist? > >TL I very much doubt the author of Rybka knows of any chess knowledge I am unaware of. I respect that Vas is able and willing to implement a good amount of chess knowledge in software though. I suspect that his use of order based pruning and qsearch has just as much to do with Rybkas success as eval. Just my take. Ryan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.