Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 09:52:33 12/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2005 at 04:00:14, Ryan B. wrote: >On December 28, 2005 at 03:12:23, Vasik Rajlich wrote: > >>Interesting game. I didn't like .. h6 and .. g5 by Rybka in the opening (as I >>suspect most human players won't), and there were a few moments in the endgame >>where better resistance could have been put up - but these are relatively minor >>points. >> >>The biggest issue was the incorrect sacrifice of the h6 pawn. The Rybka static >>eval incorrectly gives the following position (and others of a similar type) as >>roughly equal: >> >>[D] 8/1b2b1k1/pp1ppp2/nPq5/P1P1P3/2QRNPP1/8/1N2KB1r b - - 0 27 >> >>I'll keep to myself my proposed solution. It's a tricky issue and won't be >>handled until after the Rybka 1.2 release. If anybody wants to share here, I am >>all ears :-) >> >>Vas > >Does your eval give 2, 4, or 5 mobility points to the b7 bishop? I’m just >curious about your mobility detection for no important reason. :-) > >Ryan Sorry, I must keep my secrets :) It´s quite a bit different in Rybka anyway, but of your three numbers, I am very sure two of them are clearly inappropriate. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.