Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: How do programs handle material imbalances?

Author: James Lank

Date: 04:04:32 03/31/99


IM Larry Kaufman wrote a fascinating article on the evaluation of material
imbalances in the March Chess Life.  To make a long article short, he did some
database crunching and came out with new numerical values for the pieces, when
taking into consideration other factors (for example the value of bishop over
knight is greater when the bishop is part of the bishop pair, or Q+N is worth
slightly more than Q+B, but that advantage disappears if there are also rooks on
the board, etc.)

Some of this has been common knowledge among stonger players (i.e. most stonger
players know the value of having a pawn + bishop pair for the exchange), but
some of his conclusions were startling to me (a correspondence master); perhaps
not so startling to IM and GM level players.

This strikes me as useful knowledge as a chessplayer, but it also seems that it
would be invaluable information to put into chess programs.

Has this concept been implemented to any great degree in top level programs?

Jim Lank



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.