Author: James T. Walker
Date: 07:24:37 01/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 04:18:17, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >On January 02, 2006 at 00:26:52, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Hello Tom, >>He doesn't seem too concerned about blitz performance but he has produced a >>great engine anyway. >>I played the 3 Rybkas vs 3 different opponents. The opponents all used their >>own books. The 3 Rybkas used Fritz8.ctg. Each Rybka played 120 games vs each >>opponent (360 games total). Ponder was on and each engine had it's own CPU on a >>dual core AMD. Here is what happened. >> >>Vs Fritz 8 >>Rybka Beta 66.5-53.5 >>Rybka Preview 73.0-47.0 (exceptional result) >>Rybka Beta 7 68.0-52.0 >> >>Vs Fruit 2.2.1 >>Rybka Beta 71.5-48.5 >>Rybka Preview 66.5-54.5 >>Rybka Beta 7 63.0-57.0 >> >>Vs TogaII 1.1 >>Rybka Beta 78.5-41.5 >>Rybka Preview 68.5-51.5 >>Rybka Beta 7 68.5-51.5 >> >>Totals >>Rybka Beta 216.5/360 >>Rybka Preview 207.0/360 >>Rybka Beta 7 199.5/360 >> >>You can see by the totals its a steady decline but probably within the error >>bars. Still a bit worrysome for a blitz only fan. :-) >>(sorry for the extra messages below) > >I will do what I can do make Rybka a good blitzer, without messing up my search >too much. Most people use their engines to analyze, and don't have the patience >to wait 2 minutes on each position. > >Vas Thank you for your response. Rybka is already a good blitzer. In fact it's the best blitzer I own. It's just that I think it could be better without hurting long time controls. At least that's my wish.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.