Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 03:01:26 01/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 23:20:45, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >Andrew Martin recommends the following line in the "scheming scandanavian" video >(see below). However, Rybka think's its pretty bad for black (+.8, depth = 17)? > >Is Rybka's assessment off somehow? Or, have we now reached a point where rybka >can challenge opening theory? (one final option. Is a .8 disadvantage really >acceptable for black?) > >To quote andrew martin "Black's mobile central pawn mass, backed up by rooks, >should see him through all kinds of difficulties." > > > >1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. d4 Nf6 5. Nf3 c6 6. Bc4 Bf5 7. Bd2 e6 8. >Ne4 Qc7 9. Nxf6+ gxf6 10. Qe2 Nd7 11. O-O-O O-O-O 12. Nh4 Bg6 13. Bb3 c5 14. >d5 Nb6 15. Nxg6 hxg6 16. Ba5 e5 17. c4 Bd6 18. h4 f5 * At a first glance I agree with Rybka. In general expert human opinion should be better, but here the author may be trying to sell the opening. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.