Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: revolution in computer chess

Author: Alessandro Damiani

Date: 10:33:35 01/03/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 03, 2006 at 10:18:52, Stefan Schiffermüller wrote:

>So many chess engines became so strong last year. I suppose the reason is the
>open source code of Fruit. Now every more or less talented chess programmer can
>build an engine that is at least as strong as Fruit. (Take the Fruit code and
>change it, that it can not be called a Fruit clone.) Very talented chess
>programmers could be even stronger by combination of the Fruit knowledge  with
>their own experiences. I believe, if the Fruit code were not open than Fruit
>would be strongest engine now and Shredder were the second.
>
>Please understand me correctly. I want only express that the author of Fruit is
>the real hero of this revolution in computer chess. I dont want to degrade the
>achievments of other authors.
>
>Best Regards
>Stefan Schiffermüller

Of course the reasoning "every engine released after Fruit which makes a big
jump in strength must be based on Fruit" is nonsense. Competition is not
sleeping and waiting for open source engines.

Alessandro



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.