Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:03:59 01/04/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2006 at 09:41:01, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > > >Uri, in my opinion You are wrong. > >Only the hartest Results, Fruit 2.2.1 against > >Fritz 9 A1200 5-7, Shredd9 A1200 20-20 (Fritz 9 21,5-21,5). > >Would Fruit have against the opponents played like Fritz 9 played, and turned >around, I is reliably that Fritz 9 now ware on first place. > >Fritz 9 hold 74% against his opponents with the matches against Fruit and >Shredder 9. > >Fruit hold only 68% against his opponents with the matches against Fritz (5-7!) >and Shredder 9. > >Different is here 6% but Fruit 2.2.1 have 2851 points, Fritz 9 only 2819. > >All in all also Fritz hase must scored about 78% - 80% against all other >Programs to goes on a Ranking like Fruit 2.21, with 2850! This is hard and this >is not possible in us generation. > >Next: Thoralf says that Fruit will played too agains weaker engines, but in my >opinion should test next Programs like Hiarcs 10, Rybka 1.2, SmarThink 1.0 and >Ktulu 7.5. > >The Freature is also: Not against weaker Engines but against stronger Engines. > >That is for me the reaso why I see this Rating List as a Joke - real! > >ED. I do not agree. part of the ability of chess program is in beating weak programs and if Fruit beats Nimzo8(450 mhz) more convincingly than Fritz then it is something positive about fruit. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.