Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF Rating List 2006-01-03 - no longer acceptable !

Author: Joseph Ciarrochi

Date: 14:28:15 01/04/06

Go up one level in this thread

I think the SSDF is doing an excellent job and i am gratefull for all the work.

Having said that, does eduard post suggest some future directions? Maybe future
testing can make the Fritz sample of games more similar to the fruit sample
(i.e., so there is no difference in hardware and oponents).

 The current list has fruit significantly better than fritz9, but the CEGT list
has them as similar, and all my (admitadly informal) tests has them as equal.
Maybe as the number of games keep coming in, we will see the gap between fruit
and fritz decrease?

best
Joseph

• Re: SSDF Rating List 2006-01-03 - no longer acceptable ! Dann Corbit 11:24:59 01/05/06
  • Re: SSDF Rating List 2006-01-03 - no longer acceptable ! Joseph Ciarrochi 12:18:25 01/05/06
    • Re: SSDF Rating List 2006-01-03 - no longer acceptable ! Dann Corbit 12:38:01 01/05/06
      • Re: SSDF Rating List 2006-01-03 - no longer acceptable ! Joseph Ciarrochi 12:49:03 01/05/06

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.