Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 11:48:51 01/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2006 at 13:48:02, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On January 07, 2006 at 13:38:37, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On January 07, 2006 at 13:17:57, Sune Larsson wrote: >> >>>On January 07, 2006 at 12:41:51, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>> >>>>Dir auf deutsch ganz kurz: >>>> >>>>Weil ich wegen dieser Partien (vor allem wegen der gegen Deep Junior) als >>>>angebnich Anti-Hiarcs-Anmacher abgestempelt wurde. >>>> >>>>Das aber lasse ich mir nicht gefallen, denn ich kann Partien posten die ich >>>>will, solange diese Partien echt sind! >>> >>> >>>> >>>>Ausserdem möchte ich, und dass ist das Wichtigste, mit den Partien zum Ausdruck >>>>bringen dass mich H10 bisher nicht beglückt hat! >>> >>> >>> If I read you correctly, it's very important for you to show the games >>> with Hiarcs 10 - in which you were not satisfied with the play by H10. >> >>Sune, >> >>my english is very bad. In german I can all much better says. In 2004 I have >>tested Hiarcs for Palm on a Zire. I was very surprised about the strenght! >> >>In the Palm was a Palm Tiger too, and an Genius. >> >>But Hiarcs was real the best program with an nice playing style!! >> >>In this time I was belighted from the Palm Hiarcs and I make an Hiarcs Fan >>Page!! >> >>But my wish was, that Hiarcs 10 play this style like Palm Hiarcs! >> >>That was the reason why I studied the games of Hiarcs Beta for PC. But the >>Hiarcs for PC play not this style like Palm Hiarcs, when I see all the games >>in the beta test time (only few games on CSS Online Masters) an only few games >>on Playchess. >> >>The style is not good in my eyes and the resuld too. >> >>I post this games (was not blitz). >> >>Sorry but my english is bad and it is hard for me, to write further about this >>topic. >> >>Sorry, >>Eduard. >> >>Your point 2. I do not understand, sorry. >> >>> >>> If so, I can think of two ways to go: 1) Post the relevant games here >>> with your comments that pin points the flaws you find in the play of H10. >>> 2) Mail these games with your comments to the author of the engine. > >Sune, >now I understand Your point 1. and 2. > >1. Ok I can comment the games but I am not a beta tester of Hiarcs, why sshould >I do it when I have not an Hiarcs 10? The Autor should me give his last beta, >the I will gladly comment this games. > >2. Or post him (Mark Uniacke) my impressions of the new Hiarcs 10 X. > >On the other Hand, Mark Uniacke have his beta testers (Thorsten Czub is one too) >and this testers know more then I. > >>> I think both ways might work in a productive way. > >If Mark is interesting that I help him make Hiarcs stronger, also should he send >me a Beta-Engine to test. To me the same. I am so free to take Hiarcs 10 for free. I also make the program stronger. Promissed. > >I am Free! :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.