Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 03:01:14 01/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2006 at 05:28:07, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >Ok, i believe you folks when you say that testing an engine against its earlier >verison does not do a great job of proving that the later engine (9) is >stronger. Still, for interest sake,....... > >5 minute 1 sec blitz >noomen positions >Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz with 1,023 MB Memory > >Rybka beta9 wins 57.5 to 42.5 > >Ok, so that is a good start for the newer beta release. I'm guessing there is >real improvement here, but i can't prove it yet. . Now, to test it against other >engines . Oh, to have a basement full of computers:() and by the time my one >poor computer is done, vas will have released another version > >best >Joseph Joseph, thanks for testing, I've added it to my data table. Indeed Beta 9 is about to become obsolete, but the data is still very useful. I want to be able to attach rating differences to the changes which I make, even after I am convinced that the changes were productive. (Which I now am re. Beta 9.) Search is a very strange thing and quite often I still guess wrong. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.