Author: Rafael Vasquez
Date: 11:32:24 01/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2006 at 12:55:45, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 12, 2006 at 11:13:41, Rafael Vasquez wrote: > >> >> >>140 Rebel Decade Pentium 90 MHz 2176 29 -30 563 45% 2213 >>27 Rebel 12.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2681 32 -32 484 57% 2630 >>16 Pro Deo 1.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2724 27 -26 712 64% 2622 >> >> >>Anyway, seem like NO program has improved 200 rating points on the same >>hardware > >I'm trying to understand this thread frankly. Is it because Rybka is known to This is NOT a thread on that program. Sorry, nothing to do whit it. >have progressed several hundred points that you started it? If you take any >program of sufficient strength, and compare it to its earliest generations >you'll find a huge disparity. Just try comparing Hiarcs 4 with Hiarcs 10 on the >smae hardware. Fritz 3, 4 or even 5 with Fritz 9. You won't find them all on the >same hardware on the SSDF, but this is normal as they were many years apart, and >it would be kind of insane to test an engine that is neither the more recent >generation nor even competitive. > >The above is bizarre since Rebel Decade is a freeware, dumbed down version of >Rebel 10, and Rebel 12 and PD1.1 are programs that are one generation apart. > >As to the SSDF, the best I could come up with is: > >3 Shredder 9.0 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2818 24 -23 995 70% 2667 >33 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2660 26 -26 739 50% 2657 > > Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.